Images of the proposed Windows Terminal redesign appear to have been posted on Github and then swiftly passed by Microsoft, suggesting that a significant upgrade for Windows Terminal is coming soon. The updated Windows Terminal redesign is based on WinUI controls and it includes a new settings page. Version 1. Windows Terminal design refresh will also arrive on both Windows 11 and Windows 10, but the Mica effect if it is introduced will be exclusive to Windows I use it quite a lot to stage a subset of a change, and then drop the rest of it.
In that sense, it's like an overpowered undo tool that helps me keep a change I want without having to rewrite the whole thing. As far as I have seen I prefer the cmdline myself Git UIs usually have all sorts of features to select what changes should go into what commits down to single text lines.
IMHO this sort of fine grained 'commit management' would be the only reason to use a git UI over what the command line offers. You can also [e]dit each thing and rewrite as desired, though it can be a bit fiddly. I have broken out a UI just to simplify staging some gnarly commits. GUIs are also often nicer for understanding and resolving nasty three-way merge conflicts. I haven't actually tried git-gui, only gitk I'll have to give it a try, thanks : A first-party GUI actually gives me some hope for correct behavior.
I repeatedly run into this using the interactive features. Jaxan 44 days ago root parent prev next [—]. I very much agree to this. I can do things like drag branches between commit nodes. I find this so much easier and safer than the cli.
I actually use git via a TUI text user interface by using vim to either read from or write to git commands. In addition to what I wrote above using git apply --cached, I can actually edit hunks from within vim and then filter the hunk with the diff header through the recountdiff utility that comes with patchutils. That basically updates the numbers in the line that starts with to account for the changes in the number of added and removed lines introduced by the edit.
This way, I can stage my changes and still exclude extraneous changes or debug statements I've added to the code. I've actually found this to be a better experience compared to using the -p option. You can press Spacebar to stage individual lines and then partially commit or stash the staged stuff. I agree with you, but it does feel strange whenever I do dip into IDEs which have thousands of features built-in to keep you inside the IDE but to then revert back to the command-line to do git stuff.
IntelliJ allows partial commits really well. Use it all the time. SmartGit also does the same. One problem with intellij UI is that it doesn't let you 'uncheck' line ending change from being staged like it does for individual changes in a file. I'm definitely team command-line for git, but I've been happily using lazygit to quickly review repo changes before committing and it's been pretty good for that.
Gitkraken has an undo button :. I know this is going to sound elitist, but it always bothers me to see comments like this that make it seem like it's okay to not learn how computers work even though you're a software developer which I'm assuming you are. The command line isn't some mystical scary thing, it's a extremely effective method of controlling a computer.
It's survived this long for a reason, and it's not going to go anywhere. It's powerful, and extremely simple. Children learn how to use it every day nerdy children, but still. Try spending a few hours over the weekend actually trying to learn it. If you do, you'll see how it's a lot easier than you thought, and saying that you're "terrified" of it is silly. I think most of the aversion towards the terminal comes from how easy it is to screw up things with it as well.
There are hundreds of horror stories where one missing "-" or some other character ended up nuking people's entire works and databases worth many hours. Having a GUI gives a buffer and dramatically lowers the chances of doing things that you didn't intend to do.
Another aspect of this is that people will never really learn Git with a GUI and all these aliased commands. I'm not against aliases and I use them, but only on software that I'm very familiar with.
Developers who are afraid of Git need to sit down and read Pro Git and learn the most commonly used commands, and use a quality reference for the more obscure ones. PetahNZ 43 days ago root parent prev next [—].
That's funny, I'm the exact opposite. An old gray beard pair programmed with me at my first development job. I've never been able to get used to any UI over Git. I am way faster and more proficient with the CLI. I haven't used that one, but the experience you describe is similar to GitSavvy in Sublime.
Which is the only reason I install sublime these days. So I just tried it out and it's noticeably more irritating than magit on first brush: doesn't work well with vim plugins I'm the exact opposite.
It's impossible to craft a complex GUI intuitively I think. Apparently it was also impossible to craft a complex CLI intuitively. It's totally opposite for me. Usually, I feel like git is more than enough. But when I have my push rejected because I failed to fetch first, it's just a single click in IntelliJ to fetch, rebase my work on that and push it again. There's also hub, from GitHub.
I find myself using "hub sync" to update all my local branches at once. The command-line is the gateway to scriptability. Sure it makes some operations cumbersome but after you get over the learning curve the returns are spectacular. I think it's possible to create a git GUI that is superior to the cmdline, but I've never seen it.
SublimeMerge usually works fine, very useful for staging hunks. I still do interactive rebase on the cmdline tho. This has the same vibe as cooking a piece of beef until it's shoe leather. GhettoComputers 44 days ago root parent next [—]. Doesn't mean anyone should ever choose a unicycle over a car unless you're a clown I guess.
GhettoComputers 43 days ago root parent next [—]. If you prefer imagemagick to photoshop. I maintain a bunch of git aliases in my. The name of the update package can vary and may include a language, edition, and processor component. Setup can integrate the latest product updates with the main product installation so that the main product and its applicable updates are installed at the same time. You can prepare an installation of database engine instance to include product update:.
The update installer ensures that the shared components are always at or above the version of the instance at the highest level. When possible, supply security credentials at run time. If you must store credentials in a script file, secure the file to prevent unauthorized access. I also think I had a issue with my routing table too. If your lookups are resolving correctly I would open a shell prompt and try to traceroute to a host on the Internet like google. That looks like a branded Lanner box.
Just install pfSense on it. So here's my progression thru firewalls. I started with Untangle on a pc with multiple NICs. However, I had issues with networking rules not behaving. That's my journey and I'm not repeating the mistakes I made in the past. PfSense works, it does exactly what I need it too and I am grateful for that.
Thanks again! Register Login. New Year brings "Unable to check for updates".
0コメント